ARTEL GEOPOLITIKA
Belgrade, November 7, 2002
Introduction
Two years after the October transfer of power in Serbia, the political
and economic state of the country and the nation are even worse
than before October 5 (Yugoslavia having already become collateral
damage), and we face the destruction of what little is left. Most
citizens are either unaware of this or turn a blind eye to the
facts, believing that would shield them from ghosts and fears,
probably weary of a decade of stress, countless "moments of destiny,"
political crises, undeclared and unrecognized wars, humanitarian
bombing, lustration and "education." For those unaware of the
impending Golgotha (as Prof. Emil Vlajki recently termed it),
we will try to give a short assessment of current affairs and
indicate what awaits us in the near and distant future. Aware
of the risk that events could prove us wrong, we hope they do.
Most of all, we hope for a change in international circumstances
to our favor, as they were shown to have crucial influence on
our country.
Though we realize that such an ambitious task can take up volumes,
respecting the time and patience of our readers we will try to
be specific and concise.
Foreign Policy
Even though the current government lists as its greatest success
our return into the international community and cooperation with
the world, supposedly now enjoying the full respect of foreign
partners - the very people who were demonizing and bombing until
just recently - the situation is rather different.
Since toppling the former government, the current regime has accepted
every foreign extortion and demand and given up our continuity
of UN membership (which will have long-term negative consequences).
It still persistently accepts and implements all foreign dictates,
without any consideration or regard to our vital national and
state interests, placing our country into an even more inferior
position, weakening its defense and forestalling possibilities
of autonomous existence and development. Meanwhile, instructed
by its Western mentors, the current regime bombards us daily with
propaganda aimed at weakening any cohesion of our society. By
manipulating history, fragmenting identity, culture, and traditions
of our people, and placing upon us the guilt for events for which
others - the West, first and foremost - are much more responsible,
they aim to disorient the citizens and engender a collective apathy.
Low voter turnout in the recent presidential election indicates
they have succeeded to a degree.
Even though the West hand-picked, financed, and trained terrorists
and separatists, and promoted them in the media while threatening,
cajoling and extorting us on their behalf with the sole purpose
of destroying the former Yugoslavia, they now blame us for it
all. And not just blame, but put on trial. They even rewrite history
and teach our children in schools that we deserved the bombing,
even though it has been condemned by most of the world and even
many citizens of NATO countries.
All of this is aimed to weaken our mental immune system and turn
us into a shapeless, clueless mob unable to realize what is being
done to them, let alone do anything about it. Thus confused, we
would not realize the long-term negative implications of events,
designed to turn the clock two centuries back and wipe us off
the Balkans and European maps as a country of any influence, at
which point we would be denied any opportunity for development,
economic or otherwise. Yet we look on with resignation, or even
approval, in our erroneous belief that the world is praising and
supporting us. We consider agreeing with the policy of our own
destruction a great success.
Let us mention just some so-called successes of our foreign policy:
- By renouncing our continuity,
we agreed that the FRY (est. 1992) was a new country, which means
it could be ruled responsible for aggression against Croatia and
Bosnia, and genocide against their population. We should not doubt
the likelihood of this verdict, because Hague prosecutors will
"prove" anything their masters (US and UK) tell them to. The process
is already in court, and if we are found guilty, we would be required
to pay enormous war reparations to these two former Yugoslav republics
and recently manufactured sovereign states. Aside from the fact
that this would be absolutely untrue and fabricated, how could
we pay the reparations if we cannot survive as it is? There would
be other negative consequences as well.
- On the issue of our former common homeland's succession, we
have accepted almost all demands of other republics, giving up
property of Serbia acquired prior to entering a union with other
nations (which were then ruled by foreign empires), all in the
name of some undefined pragmatism and abstract cooperativeness.
Who had the right to do that, and on whose behalf? History will
judge.
- Without exception, we have obeyed the diktat of foreign powers,
without regard to the dignity of our people, our state, and our
nation. To the illegal and illegitimate tribunal in The Hague,
we have delivered a former president, forced another president
to testify, and it seems a third president will be on his way
there as well. We believe this world record in submissiveness
and self-abasement will be hard to match. Tribunal's investigators
freely travel around Serbia and pursue their victims as if this
state did not exist. No one can guess who might be the next sacrifice
to the court, but anyone intelligent might wonder why our children
would serve in the military to defend their country, when that
country can send them to foreign tribunals for doing their duty.
Given that all who fled the draft were given a general amnesty,
why would anyone answer a call to mobilization if the country
became endangered in the future? God forbid we have to test that
notion. Even though The Hague Tribunal indicts people at will,
without valid accusations or reliable witnesses, this is understandable;
it is a political court, persecuting those who defy the only surviving
world empire. But if extradition of one's citizens to foreign
courts were legitimate, why would the US try everything to ensure
their military personnel would not be tried by such courts?
- Even though the Belgrade regime is completely loyal to the US
and the EU, the Western position regarding Kosovo has not changed
at all. Kosovo is still sailing towards independence, Serbs and
non-Albanians are still murdered and expelled, while Americans
calmly build their new military bases, closing their eyes to crime,
destruction of churches and monasteries, and seizures of property.
Our government does not even bother to object, while some of its
high officials have much more understanding for American arguments
and interests than our own. The way things are, obviously the
US is only waiting for the right moment to "reluctantly" accept
the final separation of Kosovo, supposedly under pressure of Kosovo's
inhabitants (ignoring, of course, the role of violence in establishing
the current majority). Our government, if it remains the way it
is, will find a way to give its blessing while officially issuing
words of condemnation to calm down the public opinion and those
who were expelled by the terror of Albanian separatists.
- Relations between Serbia and Montenegro are no better than they
were under Milosevic. Before October 5, 2000 they were poor supposedly
because of Milosevic and his undemocratic regime. Why do they
remain poor still, and why does Montenegro persist in its separatist
aspirations? Despite the alleged European insistence on a joint
state, which the proposed Charter (and that term reveals what
sort of union they have in mind) makes anything but a state, it
is clear that Montenegro's separation actually has Western support
and approval. Everyone reasonable knows that the separation of
Serbia and Montenegro will have long-term negative consequences
for both. Also, the infamous Charter does not even mention Kosovo,
and it is pretty obvious why. The three-year probation period
will likely serve another purpose, for example, to undermine Serbia
even further in Sandzak and Vojvodina, while dismantling the Army
and other institutions of government. Then no one would be able
to stop the final and complete destruction of Yugoslavia and Serbia.
Western plans would be fully realized, and we would suffer a total
defeat after two centuries of struggle marked by our ancestors'
bloody self-sacrifice, horrible persecution and pogroms, injustices
and betrayals. If someone disagrees, they should answer the following
questions:
- Why is it, now that
Serbia has a "democratic" government that favors everyone's national
interests except its own and gladly obeys all foreign demands,
separatists in southern Serbia, Raska (Sandzak) and Vojvodina
are thriving and escalating their provocations? Their constant
"problems" are obviously only waiting for a green light by foreign
sponsors to begin using the already proven methods of separation.
- Now that we are partners, "democrats" and "friends," why would
the US and her vassals not allow Serbs to return to Kosovo? What
about the institutions: our military, police, judiciary? It would
be no special favor - all of this is written in the UN Resolution
1244, which they ought to comply with. Or is it only Iraq that
should comply with UN resolutions? Anyway, why haven't they created
law and order in the province? They have over 50,000 troops there
alone, not to mention police, civilian officials, non-governmental
and other organizations…
- Now that our government wants to join the Partnership for Peace,
why do NATO and the US still incessantly pressure our military,
fabricating affairs intended to undermine it? If they really cared
about our partnership, shouldn't they strengthen and support our
military?
- Why does the US insist on revising the Dayton Agreement to create
a unified Bosnia, even though the Serb Republic is powerless and
Bosnia is a direct foreign protectorate?
- Why
is our country threatened with sanctions and denied entry into
the Council of Europe, even though our government has done everything
that was demanded, and when no domestic issue is resolved without
interference or participation of foreign powers in one way or
another, often at the expense of our own people and country?
- Finally, why is our economy being destroyed and sold off to
foreigners, even though it survived the wars and sanctions, and
has remained better than the economies of surrounding nations?
Finally, a word about our diplomacy,
as it is the first line of defense of our country and its national
interests abroad. The quality of this defense is obvious looking
at our diplomats. Though the former government employed many political
appointees, it at least kept many Foreign Service professionals.
The current regime has broken all barriers in disrespecting this
difficult and complex profession. Incompetence has now spread
to all levels, from Ambassadors and minister-counselors to advisors,
secretaries, accountants and even chauffeurs. Without discussing
specific details, it is clear that our once-strong and respected
diplomacy, despite the setbacks during the collapse of Yugoslavia,
has never been worse. Party loyalty is the foremost criterion
of employment, followed by family connections and personal loyalties.
Professionals who excelled at anything during the former administration
have been either sacked or sidelined. We doubt that anyone currently
employed in Foreign Service knows exactly what our state and national
interests currently are. As it is, they've probably copied the
relevant sections from American and British policy papers.
All of these issues pose the question about the
real intentions motivating the US and NATO. What are the reasons
for their behavior, or their ultimate goals? What are our interests,
and how do we intend to defend them?
To provide an answer, we need to establish why our country and
the Serbian people are still considered an enemy, and why our
vital interests and national defense are continually under attack.
One answer is obvious: because their actions are motivated by
their own long-term strategic, political, military and economic
interests, not our well-being. They consider our position relevant
only as far as the degree of resistance we can offer, or if we
will agree to assist in our self-destruction by putting the interests
of others before our own. It would be justified to ask what our
options would be in such circumstances. If confrontation is not
the solution, surrender will certainly not lead to salvation,
but only to defeat and misery. In any case, it should not be called
a "success."
Internal Policy
On October 5, 2000, "dictatorship" was replaced by "democracy."
What has really changed?
After years of patriotic fervor, fateful decisions, sanctions,
isolation, wars, bombing, demonization and extortion, we were
hoping for peace and prosperity. What we got was more accusations,
scandals, lustration, persecution, witch-hunts, oppressive political
correctness and propaganda the previous regime would envy. The
dust raised by current authorities hides all the fatal decisions
they are making, which lead us ever farther from our vital national
and state interests, entangling us in integrative processes whose
costs far outweigh their benefits. They are selling off our country
and its riches for petty change. They even approve the further
carve-up of our territory. This is not even a "d," let alone "democracy."
While during the previous administration the state media and political
leaders spoke of their opponents as mercenaries America and NATO
- which turned out to be right in many cases - we also had a plethora
of opposition media, including TV stations, and numerous non-governmental
organizations, round tables and clubs. They all harshly criticized
the government and blamed it for all sorts of things, most of
all corruption, wars and isolation of the country. Realistically
speaking, although the former government was accused of repressing
the media, most of the media supported the opposition and strongly
opposed the government. Today's situation is considerably worse.
There are practically no media supporting the opposition. Almost
all act like a chorus, attacking the former regime without measure
or taste, and support all sorts of "purification," mass firings,
imprisonment, seizure of businesses and property, everything the
current government does or intends to do. The citizens should
decide how democratic that behavior really is. Besides, some government
officials and many such media openly advocate bans on certain
political parties. After that, nothing should be too surprising.
On the other hand, leaders of the governing coalition constantly
accuse each other of things that would have long since forced
even remotely honest people to resign in disgrace. Which part
of that is a media circus and which a real conflict, the citizens
should decide. Still, it is undisputed that they forget all their
arguments and overcome their differences the moment boss Montgomery
reminds them their job is to do his bidding, not pretend they
are a real government.
Relations within the country are worse than ever. DOS is conflicted,
and has split into at least two factions. The SPS has gone one-up,
and is currently split into three. SPO seems unable to recover
from its self-imposed isolation. Serbian Unity part hovers around
4-5% of the vote, while the Radicals are ascendant, probably as
a consequence of popular discontent with the new government and
the current situation.
The federal parliament is also worse than ever. Montenegro is
still represented by a bloc that lost the elections at home, and
had switched in 2000 from being a Milosevic ally to a partner
of DOS - exactly what Milo Djukanovic and his DPS were until then.
If this did not decide the political future of the country, it
would all seem like a burlesque. No one takes such a parliament
seriously, nor is it capable of doing anything meaningful. It
is as if everyone is just waiting for its abolition.
However, instead of resolving the serious issues and problems
of the country and the people, such as defense, security, unemployment,
standard of living, development and so forth, all the current
government offers are scandals, conflicts, mutual accusations
and excuses. Of course, everything is blamed on the former government
and those among us who supported it with their votes. The mosaic
is completed by inevitable characters of Biserko, Kandic, Vuco
and others, who criticize and advise from their academic and globalist
vantage points, almost pontificating at us to repent - as if that
would lead us to salvation from the chaos and widespread poverty
we live in. Dignity has already been forgotten.
Crime and political murders are thriving instead of disappearing.
If the former government was blamed for such events prior to October
5, who is to blame now? Could nothing be done, nothing resolved
in the past two years? If so, why? Was it really the former government's
fault, then, or is this something typical for all governments
or even unrelated to them?
The parliament in Serbia, usually the basic instrument of democracy
in a country, dances to government's tune. It votes, decides and
schedules sessions whenever the Prime Minister tells it to. Yet
we were taught the Parliament controls the government, not the
other way around.
Foreign advisors and experts are everywhere. Economic and natural
resources are being sold off. Banks and state institutions are
abolished or destroyed. Foreign-owned banks, supermarkets, companies,
workshops and offices are opening everywhere, yet all doors are
closed to our entrepreneurs. How many Slovenian stores and companies
can be found here, and how many of ours over there?
Most laws in effect during the previous government are still in
force.
There has been no new Constitution, nor other meaningful laws,
that would "democratize" the country and the political relations
within. Once again it has been demonstrated that criticizing the
government from the opposition was easy, but implementing reforms
once in power was something quite different. Perhaps because the
circumstances change so much. Absolute power bothered the opposition
while it was the opposition. Now that they are the government,
they find it useful.
In Serbia today, most citizens feel deep disappointment and apathy.
The state has been taken over by chaos, willful abuse, nepotism,
closed-mindedness, persecution, poverty, unemployment and crime.
Anesthetized by phrases about a bright future and the inevitable
road to Europe, where they eagerly await us with open arms, we
all sink ever deeper into ruin. No one is even thinking of asking
the people whether they want the Euro-Atlantic integration, nor
of telling them what they would gain or lose from it. These are
serious issues, normally decided by referendum elsewhere.
The Economy
Economic circumstances in Serbia are also worse than ever. Although
paid analyses by subsidized or pro-government agencies offer soothing
statistics, and cabinet ministers are trying to convince the citizens
they are really much better of - they just can't seem to see it,
really - a large number of people has been utterly impoverished,
so suddenly that their bare existence has come into question.
Instead of the abundant foreign aid that had been lavishly promised
in order to topple the former government, instead of rising living
standards, economic revival, foreign investments, and new jobs,
all Serbia got was total economic deterioration.
Instead of aid, we were forgiven part of our debts, which had
illegally accrued during the sanctions and our frozen UN membership.
A drastic drop in the standard of living is obvious, not only
in the increased costs of rent, electricity and telephone, but
also the cost of services that were free until recently: education,
health care, etc.
The economy is completely blocked, not only because there is no
capital investment, but also because of widespread privatization
(i.e. plunder) that is threatening every enterprise. It is fully
justified to wonder why anyone would try doing any business, when
the government can sell their enterprise tomorrow regardless of
whether it is profitable or not.
Foreign investments are nowhere to be seen, nor will they be any
time soon, because the political, economic, and even legal circumstances
in the country are unstable. Tales of foreigners eager to invest
in Serbia are empty talk. Foreign investors have enough trouble
trying to sell their products because of hyper-production, so
they would only need us as a potential market. Even if they buy
some enterprises, they will likely end up like similar cases in
neighboring countries: closed, so the investors could sell their
own products - or alternately, used to make their products, not
ours.
Instead of new jobs, we got mass layoffs. Less so for political
reasons (revenge, though officially it does not exist), and mostly
as a "wise" economic cure for our accumulated ills. The extent
of layoffs is so immense, that the impoverished population and
blocked economy are threatening to become a chronic condition,
one that would increasingly threaten the country with popular
unrest.
If Serbia, tired of wars, conflicts and accusations, gave up resisting
foreign assaults and sacrificed its dignity, commitment to truth
and many of its vital interests for the sake of promised peace
and prosperity, then it has been harshly deceived. It got neither
peace nor prosperity, nor will it have them any time soon.
Conclusion
If any of the above could point to consistent conclusions, stemming
from an analysis of the present situation and indicating the further
developments in our country, such conclusions would necessarily
be as follows:
The US and Western powers will continue their policy of fragmenting
our territory, supporting the secession of Kosovo and Montenegro,
unrest in Raska and separatism in Vojvodina, blaming us for it
all; mostly the previous government, but indirectly this one as
well, until they reach their ultimate goal: a new international
conference to decide the final borders of this territory (ours,
if we may say so), to finally resolve the problem in this part
of Europe. Of course, they would be led by the "best of intentions,"
since we could not resolve them ourselves and Europe is in a rush
to move ahead, and has no time to wait for some savage Serb and
other primitives. America will reluctantly yet magnanimously accept
the solution, though it officially "opposed the change of borders
in Europe," as if it hadn't changed many of them already, specifically
in the former Yugoslavia. Like good disciples, we will accept
everything they propose - that they will propose a solution is
a given - by which we would formally and legally renounce our
own territories, interests and history. It would be done "democratically,"
almost voluntarily, though "in presence of authority"(that is,
the US and Co.) Once we agree, there will be no room for second
thoughts. In a few years, they will of course claim that they
had not really wanted any of this, but that we insisted. We will
be left with the pashalik of Belgrade, which we have feared all
these years.
Naturally, this will not be the outcome or a confirmation of any
"conspiracy theory," but if anyone becomes suspicious, it would
be explained by their "paranoia" and "obsession with history."
For this would be our "democratic will," and "our own decision,"
hard but courageous, as honored representatives of the world would
put it, and of course in the "interest of civilization." That
way, we will all fit under that one plum tree the Tarabic prophets
mentioned. Since we are already experiencing declining birth rates
because of apathy and poverty, and many are emigrating abroad,
it doesn't seem like the plum's shade will be crowded, either.
Besides, there will surely be some foreigner thereabout to organize
and instruct us - in our best interest, naturally.
In order to get there, we will have more scandals, dramatic "conflicts"
in and around DOS, schisms, new witch-hunts and persecution, new
self-accusations to the joy of our enemies (and we do have them,
though some refuse to see it), resolutions of minor issues, but
never the key ones (and that will not be an accident), and of
course, the wholehearted "help" from outside friends. The more
aid we get, the more impoverished, unemployed and helpless we
will be. Just the way they want us, if they need us at all. Why
do we need any of this? Will we widen up by then, and somehow
save ourselves from the Tarabics' plum tree?
The way things are right now, only God, or a change in international
circumstances, would help us. Wise people say, "God helps those
who help themselves." If God's help depends on us, then we fear
it is already too late. There is only hope that things will change
to our benefit. It is a weak hope, but history has always been
full of surprises.
End quote.