Back to Part #1.
Back to Part #2.
SCANDAL! Dead men walking
Thus, the entire prosecution and the accompanying propaganda
was based on nothing but Herk's words. Mr. Damjanovic and
Ms. Tomic recanted as soon as they were out of torturer's
hands...
Now that even Herak recanted, it is clear that the whole
hoopla was BASED ON EXACTLY - NOTHING! Still, this did not
mean that the trio was freed.
Four years after the scandalous death sentences were uttered
the prosecution still had no MATERIAL data (and no witnesses).
Then, in early 1997, as if God himself had demanded it some
material evidence finally appeared. But not for the prosecution.
The evidence, proved, beyond the shadow of doubt, that key
portions of Mr. Herak's forced confession were clearly false.
This time the Western media was not out to make a propaganda
campaign out of it. We were able to find only four media
sources, scattered over a period of several weeks. These,
put together, give a clear picture of what happened. The
sources are:
- Agence France Presse (AFP), February 28, 1997
- Chris Hedges, The New York Times (NYT), March 1, 1997,
Page A3. Title "Jailed Serbs' 'Victims' Found Alive,
Embarrassing Bosnia"
- Jonathan C. Randal, the Washington Post, March 15, 1997,
Page A17. Title: "Serb Convicted of Murders Demanding
Retrial After 2 'Victims' Found Alive."
- Karen Coleman, The Guardian (London), March 26, 1997,
Page 14. Title: "War crimes put justice in the dock"
The AFP article was very brief, and judging by the position
of the articles in the newspapers (pages 3, 17 and 14,
respectively), it is obvious that this was not considered
significant news.
We will start with the NYT, because it is nice to see
how they tried to downplay the importance of the event.
Then other sources will be compared and contrasted.
The NYT article begins:
In a major embarrassment for the Bosnian Government,
two Muslim brothers whose supposed murders were used
as evidence in a highly publicized war crimes trial
to condemn two Bosnian Serbs to death have been found
living in a Sarajevo suburb.
|
There are a few things wrong with this statement:
First, "highly publicized war crimes trial" was not only
used "to condemn two Bosnian Serbs to death." By 1997
when this article was published, NATO had bombed and
ethnically cleansed the Serbian people from Krajina and
most of Bosnia. This atrocious act was possible in the
first place thanks to the media's role in demonizing not
some unimportant Bosnian Serbs, but the ENTIRE Serbian
people. As result of the bash-then-bomb campaign, close
to a million Serbs were dispossessed from everything
they EVER owned, their land, their farms, their possessions
plus often their lives. In their long and bitter history
of well over thousand years the Serbian people NEVER
experienced such a disaster.
Second, because this military slaughter followed directly
from the gleeful participation of the Western press in
Goebbelsian propaganda campaign based on lies and hearsay,
it is not only the Bosnian Islamic fundamentalist
government but Western media and Western governments
that should have been embarrassed - to say the least.
It was, after all, official pronouncement and the rabid
yellow journalism of newspapers like the New York Times
that "highly publicized the war crimes trial."
Let us be clear once more, because it is crucial to state
it: We do not believe that the Western governments and the
Western media were fooled into anything. There were countless
scandals of this sort. Just having in mind their numbers rule
out any notion of error or accident. Indeed, a SYSTEM of
purposeful deception emerges.
The third oddity with the New York Times opening sentence
is that the two "victims" were not just "found" alive. Said
that way one would think that the two "supposedly murdered"
brothers simply, miraculously survived Serbian torture
and violence.
Let us give the NYT (March 1, 1997) more chance to explain:
Mr. Damjanovic, 36, was found guilty, largely on a
confession he later said was made under torture, of
killing the two brothers and a third man, Krso Ramiz.
But in yet another blow to the case, internal documents
show that the Sarajevo public prosecutors office has
charged three other Bosnian Serbs -- Nenad Damjanovic
(not related to Sretko), Vukovic Miro and Jeftic Bozo
-- with carrying out Mr. Ramiz's murder.
During the trial, Sretko Damjanovic recanted his
confession and said he had been severely abused by
the Muslim police until he signed the document. The
court doctor confirmed at the trial that Mr. Damjanovic
had four knife wounds and a broken rib that appeared to
have been inflicted while in police custody.
In Mr. Damjanovic's confession, he stated that he was
responsible for the killing of the two brothers, Kasim
and Asim Blekic.
"The two principal pieces of evidence used to convict
my client were his signed confession, where he supposedly
admitted to murdering two men who we now know are alive,
and the testimony of his co-defendant, Borislav Herak,"
said Mr. Damjanovic's lawyer, Branko Maric. "How can my
client's supposed confession be considered valid now?
And how can the testimony of Mr. Herak, who said he
witnessed these alleged murders, also be accepted by the
court?"...
Mr. Herak said in the trial that he saw Mr. Damjanovic
kill Kasim and Asim Blekic as well as Mr. Ramiz. He
said he also saw Mr. Damjanovic kill three other people
who were not identified in the trial. No other witnesses
were presented...
Kasim Blekic, who now raises sheep in a small shed
next to his house in the Vogosca suburb, said he was
unaware that his supposed killing had been used to
indict Mr. Damjanovic until a year ago when Vogosca,
which was under Bosnian Serb control, was handed back
to the Muslim Government as part of the Dayton peace
agreement.
Mr. Blekic, his wife and two children had fled their
small home in Vogosca in May 1993 when they found
themselves living along what became the front line.
His house was destroyed in the fighting. Mr. Blekic, 43,
became an ambulance driver for the army during the war.
He and his brother lived in Sarajevo until the fighting
ended.
"I didn't return to Vogosca until last year when
the Serbs were leaving," he said, standing next to
a small, muddy pen that held about two dozen bleating
sheep.
"I was buying cattle in those days from a lot of the
Serbs, including many of my old neighbors. I went to
see the uncle of Sretko Damjanovic, an old friend,
and he said he couldn't believe I was alive. He told
me his nephew had been sentenced to death for killing
my brother and me. They all looked at me as if I was
a ghost."
Mr. Blekic said he knew Mr. Damjanovic and his family.
He described his relationship with the condemned man
as "normal." He said he never saw Mr. Damjanovic in
April and May 1992, when the killings were supposed
to have occurred.
United Nations international police monitors showed up
last summer at Mr. Blekic's new house in Vogosca, which
ONCE BELONGED TO A SERB NEIGHBOR, to photograph him and
copy the information on his identity card. But this was
the last he heard from the United Nations team.
"We are the only Blekic family in Vogosca," he said.
At the end of last year relatives of Mr. Damjanovic
reached his lawyer in Sarajevo with the news. And in
December [Mr. Damjanovic's lawyer] Mr. Maric filed a
motion for a new trial.
|
So, according to the NYT, Mr. Blekic stumbled on Mr. Damjanovic's
uncle. Right? Once he learned that his neighbor is sitting on
death row did Mr. Blekic do something to remedy injustice?
The same article says that the Blekic's were discovered "at the
end of the last year"? This would mean that no-one cared, for
months, to report on the miracle.
The Washington Post (March 15, 1997), is more precise on both
accounts:
[L]ast SUMMER a cousin of Damjanovic's established that
Asim and Kasim Blekic, Muslim brothers who were listed
among [Mr. Damjanovic's] victims, were alive and well in
the Sarajevo suburb of Vogosca...
"The first time I heard I was dead was when Damjanovic's
cousin brought a patrol of the international police,"
Kasim Blekic told reporters. "I told them we were the
only Blekic family in the region."
|
Also, the New York Times' article (March 1, 1997) quoted above
states that the Blekic's had to "flee" during the war and when
the Serbs "left" (the Serbs did not have to flee?) Mr Blekic got
a new house. It took quite some reading to realize that Mr. Blekic
now lives in a SERBIAN house.
Let us translate it for you: The Serbs were, thanks to NATO
bombing and Dayton "negotiations" under those bombs - forced
to leave their ancestral houses in Sarajevo. Sarajevo was CLEANSED
of the Serbs, the people who founded the city more than 15 hundred
years ago! Our Muslim "victim", Mr. Kasic, enjoys the benefits of
that NATO ethnic cleansing.
The inquisition
The New York Times article (March 1, 1997) mentions twice the
word "confession" Mr. Damjanovic had signed - as if that piece
of paper ever meant anything. Then it adds (we mentioned this
paragraph before):
During the trial, Sretko Damjanovic recanted his
confession and said he had been severely abused by
the Muslim police until he signed the document. The
court doctor confirmed at the trial that Mr. Damjanovic
had four knife wounds and a broken rib that appeared to
have been inflicted while in police custody.
|
Four knife wounds and a broken rib. Let us look at it
more closely.
Washington Post (March 15, 1997), on the same subject:
Damjanovic, 36, ... was convicted almost solely on the
basis of Herak's testimony and a confession that he told
the military tribunal had been extracted under torture
soon after his arrest. Throughout the week-long trial he
maintained his innocence. He showed the court scars from
knife wounds in both legs and a broken rib, all of which
a court-appointed doctor said were inflicted during his
detention.
|
So it is knife wounds in BOTH LEGS and a broken rib.
Now The Guardian (London), March 26, 1997:
In a room at Sarajevo central prison he took off his
top, asking: "Do you want me to show you what they
did to me?" He slapped his rib cage. "See how my ribs
stick out."
His bones protrude. There are scars on his SHOULDERS
AND ARMS. Many of his TEETH are missing. And, he
claimed, he still URINATES BLOOD. "My health is
ruined."
|
Let us sum up. Mr. Damjanovic's wounds include:
- knife wounds in SHOULDERS AND ARMS
- knife wounds in BOTH LEGS
- broken ribs
- missing teeth
- he urinates blood.
Now was this an "interrogation" as Western media have
called it or was it medieval torture, an INQUISITION.
This man was put into a meat grinding machine! Was Mr. Herak
forced to watch? How much can one endure? How much could you
endure? Or would you also say anything to avoid being treated
as an animal?
We believe that the overwhelming majority of the Western
audience is still unaware of the autrageous nature of this
scandal. Most people are completely unaware of how the
Western press played with their emotions while manipulating
national and international public opinion for political purpose.
The Muslim motives
Remember how the Western media, the New York Times in
particular, had reported matter-of-factly everything the
frightened Mr. Herak had to say. The media, at the time,
completely "forgot" that the Muslims may have had some motive
to misrepresent things. Was it naivete?
Let us see what New York Times had to say at the time
the walking dead were discovered (NYT, March 1, 1997):
The finding of the brothers has raised troubling
questions about how the guilty verdict was reached.
The two Serbs, currently in a Sarajevo prison, were
condemned to death by a military court.
Discovery of the Muslim brothers has exposed what
defense lawyers say was the undue haste of the trial,
which produced no physical evidence, and the heavily
charged political atmosphere that colored the
judicial ruling.
The trial, which was widely covered by the international
press, was used by the Muslim Government to publicize
the brutal "ethnic cleansing" campaign then being
carried out by the Bosnian Serbs.
|
Did the Muslim government use the naive international press?
Or would readers of the media's claim of innocence be naive
to believe it?
Did you notice how the Serbs, despite the refutation of ALL
of Herak's lies, are still routinely assumed to be guilty
"ethnic cleansing" (the term coined during the Herak's trial).
Let us continue (NYT, ibid):
The trial of the two Serbs, Sretko Damjanovic and
Borislav Herak, in March 1993 was the first attempt
by the Sarajevo legal system to try Bosnian Serbs for
genocide and other war crimes. It was intended to begin
a judicial process that would see those Serbs who were
responsible for the killings of tens of thousands of
Muslims brought to justice.
But it was also used to convince Europe and the United
States that the Serbs were guilty of genocide and other
crimes against humanity.
|
Poor, naive European and United State governments. They
were fooled by some Bosnian Muslims, and it seems they have
never recovered.
More on the "impartial trial"
The Washington Post (March 15, 1997) wrote:
Sretko Damjanovic, a Serb soldier in the Bosnian civil
war, was convicted of genocide four years ago for the
murders of five unarmed people, several rapes and
various other crimes. Now two of his victims have turned
up alive, casting doubt on the testimony that led to his
conviction and spurring his lawyer to demand a retrial.
The highly charged case was tried before a military
tribunal run by the predominantly Muslim Bosnian government
during the dark hours of 1993, when Sarajevo was enduring
a long siege under Bosnian Serb artillery. Damjanovic and
a friend, Borislav Herak, were convicted together and
condemned to death by firing squad, a sentence later
reduced to life imprisonment.
|
The same article, at last, reveals who was Mr. Damjanovic's
lawyer. Earlier in the trial Western media was mentioning that
the defense was court (i.e. Muslim authority) appointed.
The defense lawyers were Serbs. Here is on Mr. Damjanovic's
lawyer Mr. Branko Maric (WP, March 15, 1997):
Maric, who normally practices corporate and COMMERCIAL
LAW, repeatedly sought to have the trial postponed. In
a recent interview, he said that in preparing Damjanovic's
defense he was not allowed to see his client except in a
guard's presence -- "the first time that happened to me
in my 24-year career." Maric also said he was given less
than 10 days to prepare Damjanovic's defense and recalled
having to work by candlelight in the darkened city to
complete the appeal on time.
|
Imagine, if you dare, yourself as the defendant. You are
vilified internationally and accused of no less than
GENOCIDE! The whole world is viewing you as no more than
a scum. You have an enemy-appointed lawyer whose only legal
expertise is commercial law. Like you, he is a Serb, and his
family is at mercy of the same enemy. He is allowed to visit
you only infrequently and only when your "interrogators" are
present. You are Herak or Damjanovic. What are your chances
to survive? A world super-power supports your nemesis; your
torturers. There is NO-ONE to help you...
Finally, The Guardian (London), March 26, 1997 on the
subject of Muslim motives behind the trial:
Bosnia's manner of conducting war crimes proceedings
is raising doubts whether the accused are getting a
fair hearing. Eight are under way, including two cases
being heard in the absence of the accused. But the
problems of justice in the divided country are
long-standing...
The trial was a showcase. With people desperate to
see Serbs punished for the atrocities committed during
the war, the chances of a fair hearing were slim...
|
Yes, all of this was nothing but a show trial before a
Bosnian Muslim kangaroo court. Muslim's Western patrons
will soon take over - and pursue a similar pharse in the
Hague.
In the Hague, the democratic West will repeat the same
patterns of scandalous fabrication of evidence that was
seen in the Herak/Damjanovic case.
When NATO's occupying police (a Gestapo of a sort) embark
on Serb-hunt, when they lure Serbs into a trap by false
promises and guarantees, they say that the unwary Serbs
simply stumbled into their hands, just as Herak and his
friends did.
Why invent anything new - this model has worked.
The Islamists' reaction. Retrial?
How did the Muslim government react to the scandal and
calls for retrial? Back to our sources.
New York Times (March 1, 1997):
Government officials were reluctant today to discuss
the case.
Azra Omeragic [a Muslim], the president of the Sarajevo
county court, said there would be an evaluation of the
request by the defendant's lawyers for a new trial. But
she added that the decision was not the responsibility
of her office and had been handed over to the public
prosecutor's office. She said she did not want to
comment further.
The chief public prosecutor, Domin Malbasic [a Muslim],
said the request for a retrial had not reached his office.
|
Washington Post (March 15, 1997):
Damjanovic's lawyer, Branko Maric, took the new
information to Sarajevo's appeals court four months
ago and demanded a new trial. The court's president,
Azra Omergic, said an answer will be issued next week,
and until then Damjanovic and Herak will remain in jail.
Maric argued that the Blekics' existence justifies a
retrial because it casts serious doubts on the testimony.
But the Sarajevo establishment has reacted as if the
brothers' existence were a Balkan plot instead of
exculpatory evidence.
Chris Bennett, a senior analyst with the International
Crisis Group, suggested that local reluctance to accept
that the 1993 trial was based on faulty evidence is
linked to Muslim disappointment with the U.N. war crimes
tribunal in The Hague.
|
The proxies are not happy with the master. The Muslims insist
that unless the Hague prosecutes more Serbs, the Bosnian
tribunal will keep innocents in prison. Master better listen
to the dissatisfied proxy. What a joke.
Mr. Chris Bennett, continued (WP, ibid):
"Sadly, it appears that fundamentally this is a society
where to some extent people need to blame someone for
what happened during the siege," he said. "They think
they are getting nothing out of The Hague, which
essentially is trying Croats and Muslims, not Serbs.
[sic!]
"This is worse than denial," he added. "It's a problem
of attitude, when the rights of nations pervade all
aspects of society and are deemed more important than
justice for a young Serb who is at least innocent of
two murders. Why? Because it is more important that
he is a Serb; for them, Serbs are guilty. He represents
the Serbs -- end of the story."
The discovery that the Blekic brothers are alive was
first reported... on Feb. 27. But it was ignored by
Bosnian state television. Even the Sarajevo newspaper
Oslobodjenje, much honored internationally [by the
masters] for its heroic determination to publish
daily throughout the city's 3 1/2-year siege, ignored
the new evidence for two weeks.
"This is an example of state-controlled media
masquerading to the outside world as independent --
something inherited from the old Communist model before
the war," said Enver Causevic [a Muslim], president
of the Bosnia-Herzegovina Journalists' Union.
|
So, would there be a retrial after all of those excuses?
The New York Times, June 15, 1997, Page A12, title:
"Bosnia Verdict Stands Though Victims Live"
A Bosnian court has rejected a call for the retrial
of a Serbian soldier convicted of killing two Muslim
brothers who were recently found to be alive...
"The court rejected my retrial motion as unfounded,"
Mr. Maric said today. He plans to appeal.
The court found there was no need for a new investigation,
saying "there was plenty of other evidence sufficient for
a verdict."
|
The Muslim brothers Blekic who were never harmed by the
defendants and who now live in an ethnically cleansed Serbian
house are still referred to as "VICTIMS!" An elegant, simple,
Big Lie. It works when repeated: "...there was plenty of
other evidence..." What other evidence!?
Those who are paid to lie - lie with ease.
The Master's justice
Many months have passed since the scandal of dead men walking
was revealed. Mr. Damjanovic, all chopped to pieces by his
Muslim interrogators' knives, spent all of that time in jail
waiting for a retrial. He was in jail for five long years.
For who knows what reason, the western masters (who control
Bosnia in every shape and form) decided to continue the circus:
BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, October 10, 1997:
Text of report by Bosnian Serb radio (Banja Luka) on
8th October
The Human Rights Chamber of Bosnia-Hercegovina -
founded in Dayton; made up of eight foreign and six
domestic judges - reached a decision in Sarajevo today
ordering the Muslim judiciary not to carry out and
immediately suspend the death sentences on Sretko
Damjanovic, sentenced on 12th March 1993 by the Muslim
[Sarajevo] district court for alleged genocide and
crimes against civilians. Damjanovic was accused of
killing two Muslim brothers in 1992, but the brothers
were later found alive.
The judiciary of the Bosnia-Hercegovina Federation was
ordered by 8th November to inform the chamber on the
measures taken with the aim of implementing the order.
On 11th December last year Damjanovic brought charges
against the Bosnia-Hercegovina Federation because of
its violation of the European convention on the
protection of human rights and liberties in connection
with the trial against him, which the Human Rights
Chamber found justified and acceptable.
Commenting on the conclusions regarding the decision on
the validity of Damjanovic's appeal in connection with
the legal provisions for carrying out the death sentence,
the chamber said the execution of the sentence would be
the violation of Protocol 6 of this convention, and
consequently the violation of Annex 6 of the Dayton
Agreement on the part of the Federation Bosnia-Hercegovina.
|
The Washington Times, February 14, 1999, Pg. A10, title:
"War criminal gets compensation"
Bosnia's Muslim-Croat federation is to pay nearly
$10,000 in damages to a former Bosnian Serb soldier
who is serving a 40-year jail sentence for war crimes,
a senior law officer said.
Seada Palavric [a Muslim], the legal attorney of the
federation, said Sretko Damjanovic, who was originally
sentenced to death, was being compensated for being
subjected to the fear of execution.
She said he should by now have received the money, but
Damjanovic's lawyer could not confirm this.
The case has provoked outrage in the federation, with
Sarajevo media demanding to know who will compensate
Bosnian citizens for their fear and suffering through
43 months of war.
|
So what is the cost of spending more than seven years
in jail? What is the cost of ruined health through vicious
torture? What is the cost of world-wide humiliation,
continuing use of war-criminal label? Did Mr. Damjanovic
ever get the money? What is the use of any money while you
are confined in the enemy's JAIL?
Another year passed, and almost two years after the
dead men walking scandal, Mr. Herak is still in jail.
Again, for unknown reasons the masters intervene with
their sense of "justice.":
Agence France Presse, February 12, 2000, title:
"Damjanovic, Serb convicted of genocide,
to be retried "
The Human Rights Chamber of Bosnia and Hercegovina has
ordered a retrial of Sretko Damjanovic, a Bosnian Serb
found guilty of warcrimes in Bosnia, Vecernje Novine
daily reported here Saturday.
Damjanovic was sentenced to death by a Sarajevo court
in 1993 after being found guilty of genocide and crimes
against civilians while fighting for the Bosnian Serb
army around Sarajevo in 1992.
In November 1998, a court changed the sentence to 40
years in prison and the Supreme Court of the Moslem-Croat
Federation reduced Damjanovic's sentence to 20 years
prison in March last year.
Now the Human Rights Chamber has accepted Damjanovic's
appeal against the Muslim-Croat Federation and ordered
the Federation to organize a new trial, the report said.
The Human Rights Chamber was established in accordance
with the Dayton Peace Agreement with the task of
monitoring the actions of public authorities, including
the judiciary.
|
And that is the last we could read about Mr. Damjanovic
in the democratic press of the West. Quite probably, as you
read this, the two people are still rottening in the Islam
fundamentalist's jail. They are guilty by birth. They dared
be born as Serbs. They are victims of resurrected Nazism of
the West.
END
Back to:
[ Herak: Part #2 ]
[ Herak: Part #1 ]
[ The Hague "Tribunal" ]